Everywhere I go during my campaign—parades, farmer’s markets, even the local deli—I keep hearing the same thing from Wisconsin voters. ‘We need real representation,’ they tell me, ‘representation that’s focused on the people and what we need.’ A lot of these folks are lifetime Republicans who voted for Paul Ryan every time his name appeared on a ballot. But they’re all telling me the same thing: they can’t do it anymore, because they just can’t get behind a plan to gut Medicare and end essential tax relief for working families.
These are ordinary Wisconsinites, men and women concerned about the real, tangible impact of Ryan’s budget. They worry about paying an extra $6,500 per year for the same health benefits after his budget kills Medicare. They wonder how they’ll be able to afford a tax increase after it ends the child tax credit. And they don’t see the fairness in slashing Pell Grants and Stafford Loans while Texaco and Shell continue to benefit from gaping tax loopholes.
All of these people understand something that Paul Ryan fundamentally doesn’t. They see that government budgets are more than just figures on a balance sheet, more than mere numbers on a page. If Congress slashes funding for student loans, less of our young people get the chance to attend school and build a small business, like I did. If Congress votes to scale back investment in scientific research, laboratories across our state close up—forcing people out of work, and reducing our chance of finding the next medical miracle to cure a dreaded disease. These are the real consequences of budget decisions, and that’s what’s at stake in this election.
Paul Ryan just doesn’t understand that. His budget sees Wisconsinites, real people, as numbers on a balance sheet. That’s why it pushes drastic cuts onto the most vulnerable in our society, like working families, students, and seniors, while asking nothing in return from those best positioned to lead our country out of the fiscal hole.
The bottom line is this: we need new representation based on the values and priorities of real Wisconsin voters. I’ve lived the American Dream, and built two successful small businesses after attending one of the most prestigious culinary schools in the world. And that’s why I want to ensure that opportunity remains for everyone. We can do better than the Ryan budget—visit www.robzerban.com to learn more about my campaign.
Rob Zerban is running to replace Rep. Paul Ryan in Wisconsin’s First Congressional District. He is an experienced business owner and job creator, having founded two companies after graduating from the Culinary Institute of America at Hyde Park. In recent weeks and months, his campaign has built momentum through the grassroots support of Wisconsinites who oppose the reckless Paul Ryan budget.
http://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=891748cb-9fe8-4040-bc23-3b6746c53d73 "I’d like to start out by pointing out that when they passed Medicare back in 1965, they estimated out 25 years and said it would cost $12 billion in 1990. In fact it ended up costing $109 billion - nine-times the original cost estimate - so I don’t have a great deal of faith in some of these estimated numbers and I certainly don’t have faith in the estimates for Obamacare. In the President’s fiscal year 2013 budget - just released - he’s increased the mandatory outlays for health insurance exchanges by $111 billion - from $367 billion in his last year’s budget to $478 billion." Same story over and over again. Government needs to shrink, not grow. The left continues to attack CEOs and the rich, but forget seem to forget about all of the leftist politicians in DC. If the CEOs were not there, they'd find someone else to make their dirty deals with. A great example is Corzine (a top Obama bundler cozy with Goldman Sachs) and MF Global. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505123_162-57494575/criminal-charges-unlikely-for-mf-global-execs/ Whatever happened to draining the swamp?
How hard is it to go after the most vulnerable? Ask any bully. The challenge is getting cooperation from the game-changers and that's not what's happening in the Ryan budget plan, just another cynical attempt to siphon off more of our economic lifeblood and hand it to those who need the money least. At least atheist adulteress Objectivist Ayn Rand, Paul's hero, wrote about characters who were willing to face the consequences of their stubbornness. Paul Ryan has said nothing about being willing to eschew his cushy Congressional bennies and automatic rate increase salary adjustments to live on his own wonderful plans for the rest of us. Paul Ryan and his inhumane atheist agenda must not be given a national platform. Please.
You can't wrap up in Ann Rand and push aside the fact he has been here for 14 yrs and is the Congressional Budget Head. Come on..use Facts to discussion because talking points are for CNN
BTW, every, EVERY, doom and gloom prediction of the left has NEVER come true.
“I, like millions of young people in America, read Rand’s novels when I was young. I enjoyed them,” Ryan says. “They spurred an interest in economics, in the Chicago School and Milton Friedman,” a subject he eventually studied as an undergraduate at Miami University in Ohio. “But it’s a big stretch to suggest that a person is therefore an Objectivist.” “I reject her philosophy,” Ryan says firmly. “It’s an atheist philosophy. It reduces human interactions down to mere contracts and it is antithetical to my worldview. If somebody is going to try to paste a person’s view on epistemology to me, then give me Thomas Aquinas,” who believed that man needs divine help in the pursuit of knowledge. “Don’t give me Ayn Rand,” he says.
Read this first: http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/04/audio-surfaces-paul-ryans-effusive-love-ayn-rand/51711/ Then follow the link to audio or click here, at the bottom before comments: http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/04/audio-surfaces-paul-ryans-effusive-love-ayn-rand/51711/ Selfish, cruel, atheist-fueled agenda. Gear, Jesus warned about hypocrites, people who trumpet their faith to the skies and act completely counter to the beliefs they claim to embrace. Rand's insidious poison imbues a mythic proportion to her characters, providing a mystical sense of reality which has clearly ensnared a few weak, already ego-centric, easily influenced minds. Most middle schoolers walk away after the book report; here's concrete evidence of a 39-year old "gushing" about this proud passport bride, adulteress, and atheist. Enjoy your atheist philosophy-infused candidate! I reject the screeds of Rand and anyone foolish enough to follow her. Utterly.
I see Ryan's rise as the rise of an actively anti-God philosophy and I have and continue to reject it.
Then liars like Zorbin slander Paul Ryan who really has a plan. It's just sad that Patch would let Zorbin's lies stand. We won't, and we're done with these people who think they can debt our way to prosperity. Give me your name and address, and I'll plant a Romney, Ryan, and a Tommy sign in your yard.
You appear to be an individual who believes that lying is a means of making a point, when actually it's just lying.
And, Bren, if you are SOO into religion, etc... then why are you a liberal when it seems all they do is try to cut down Christianity every chance they get? Stupid, much?
Jesus Christ spoke frequently about helping those in need (Parable of Good Samaritan, etc.). At least the Jesus Christ in my KJV and NIV Bibles does. Cutting social investment programs that help those in need or those who will one day be elderly doesn't seem the best way to walk in Christ's path, it seems to me. It does seem a neat way of walking in the Objectivist footprints of Paul Ryan and atheist/adulteress/passport bride/Social Security-Medicare recipient Ayn Rand, however.
It's ridiculous to blame the Democratic Party for the excesses of the Bush administration (multiple tax cuts for the wealthy, two unfunded wars) which burst the housing bubble and brought this country and international market nearly to its knees. Without the stimulus spending (which began under Bush, by the way) Wall Street would have collapsed. I think everyone agrees that that wouldn't have been good. Have you conducted any research about this at all on your own? I'm curious.