Like most Republican candidates in this fall's election, vice presidential nominee Paul Ryan is adamant about calling for the repeal of the Affordable Care Act, also known as "Obamacare."
But a report published Wednesday said Ryan didn't have a problem nearly two years ago asking for federal ACA money to establish a neighborhood health clinic in Racine.
In a letter to the Department of Health and Human Services in December 2010, Ryan asked officials for due diligence in reviewing a grant application from the Kenosha Community Health Center to establish similar medical services in Racine, according to a story from Lee Fang at TheNation.com.
Ryan recommended approval to “serve both the preventative and comprehensive primary healthcare needs of thousands of new patients of all ages who are currently without health care.”
Both Kenosha and Racine are communities in Ryan's 1st Congressional District.
In his letter obtained by The Nation and The Investigative Fund through an open records request, Ryan recognizes the need for a neighborhood medical clinic in Racine.
"Please note that target area includes census tracts ranking amongst the poorest and most-medically underserved in the State of Wisconsin," the letter said. "I am hopeful that the new proposed clinic will address the unmet needs of Racine's low-income and uninsured residents by offering access to medical, dental and mental health care."
Romney/Ryan campaign call report 'misinformation'
However, Brendan Buck, a spokesman for the Romney/Ryan campaign, pointed out in an email to Patch that the Health Centers Program as initiated by President George W. Bush in 2006 was a continuation of the original programs begun and kept alive since the war on poverty began in the 1960s.
"This grant program was created by President Bush, not Obamacare. Some misinformation and gotcha reporting from a liberal blog," he wrote.
Yet, according to information Buck provided, Bush's program expired in 2008, with final funding provided in Fiscal Year 2009. The Health Centers Program was then folded into the ACA in 2010. That means a repeal of the law, unless a contingency plan is put in place, would de-fund clinics like the one for which Ryan was recommending support.
When asked about that scenario, he responded: "Clearly funding for health clinics existed before Obamacare."
Ryan is clear on repeal of Obamacare
Ryan’s 2010 request for federal funding is a sharp contrast from the many statements he has made repealing the ACA. at the Republican National Convention in Tampa, Ryan made his position clear.
“The president has declared that the debate over government-controlled health care is over,” he said. “That will come as news to the millions of Americans who will elect Mitt Romney so we can repeal Obamacare.”
As Fang points out in his story, community health clinics all over the country have been funded with money from Obamacare and would fold without that support. Some $9.5 billion in funding for existing health centers and $1.9 billion to build new ones like the one proposed in Racine is part of the law.
“The Wisconsin congressman’s promise to repeal Obamacare would undermine the law’s five-year plan to rapidly grow the health clinic system in America by withdrawing the necessary funds,” he wrote. “The so-called Ryan Budget plan would also decimate other federal support for health clinics, according to an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.”
Zerban takes aim at Ryan
While most of the spotlight is now on Ryan as a vice presidential candidate, he is also running a race to keep his seat in the 1st District back home. Democrat Rob Zerban, who is challenging Ryan, issued a statement Wednesday slamming Ryan for his stance.
"In his own words, Paul Ryan acknowledges that there are people of this district in desperate need of quality, preventative health care and treatment. Yet he continues to promote policies that would deny life-saving care — placing partisan politics over the needs of Wisconsin's middle class families. That's wrong,” Zerban said.
“From his radical budget that ends traditional Medicare, to his support for tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans and Big Oil, Paul Ryan has failed to provide the middle class with opportunity, health care, and a fair tax system," Zerban added.
Mary K. Wakefield, an administrator with HHS, responded to Ryan's letter in January 2012, and assured Ryan the Kenosha Community Health application would get a full and fair review.
"I appreciate your support of the Health Center Program and your commitment to underserved populations in Wisconsin," she wrote.
Patch does have a message into Ryan's legislative office about the potential for alternative funding for the Health Centers Program if the ACA is repealed.
We will update this story when we get more information.
Ryan is doing exactly what he needs to do. We need to repel Obamacare and put in a new health care reform that doesn’t kill businesses and doesn’t cost us so much money.
Facts never mean much to Conservatives anyway. Keep up the good work, Patch. This community needs articles from all sides of the argument.
"This grant program was created by President Bush, not Obamacare"
Never forget about this poll Sarah posted, question anything she writes after submitting this bias piece of work. http://menomoneefalls.patch.com/articles/poll-how-do-you-feel-about-gov-walker-suspending-oct-deer-gun-hunting
"Bush's program expired in 2008, with final funding provided in Fiscal Year 2009. The Health Centers Program was then folded into the ACA in 2010." You needed to continue reading to discover all the facts. Ryan's letter was written in 2010. But the whole tie to Obamacare is irrelevant to the point of Ryan's letter - see Hoffa's summation of the facts above, and their implications, making this whole controversy in essence a non-story.
That was my point. It is a complete non story by political hacks.
Touche!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aiGg8D4hFLc http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CulYIQ-ItY http://moonbattery.com/?p=15574 Barack Obama gaffes, from the most intelligent human that the left wing could find to guide them to socialism: http://blondephotos.org/BlondeGator/?p=2332 The video the Obama does not like: http://www.stevebridges.com/obamavideos-promo-Aug-2011.html It is now time to declare WAR on the liberal, left wing "hate machine". http://therealrevo.com/blog/?p=66856 Barack Obama will be gone in ONE and we will become free of this tyrant! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZF5h7WfiYcc The President, Barack Obama has just released his new theme song for his re-election campaign for 2012: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zk9FvwfdDcg Repeat and repeat and embarrassing: http://www.youtube.com/v/erYpXzE9Pxs&
Who cares what Zerban has to say about this.
Greg, Biden has read and written several books. Whenever I think of hippos I remember this scene from The Gods Must Be Crazy (1980): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SE1AEd2NqM ; ) Yes, Ayn Rand was a proud adulteress. But she was also proudly pro-choice. She would have had a few words for Todd Akin. Mr. Hoffa, thought it was clear I was referring to Biden's earlier days as a U.S. Senator. Sorry! Concerning Biden's performance, I certainly prefer a return to VP as supporting role compared to the near-presidential overstepping of his predecessor. I found Cheney's actions unacceptable and causal factors for the unfunded war on Iraq, etc. Greg, I understood that "Atlas Shrugged" was one of the most influential on "bookish 14 year olds," the other being the one with orcs. Ayn's writing was controversial and shocking at the time because prevailing thought was on "we" not "me." And it still should be, in my opinion. We're all on this planet together, let's make it work for everyone.
You are constantly rambling about the "unfunded war[s]" that Bush got us into. Traditionally, our funding of wars has been with debt. Do you blame Democrats Woodrow Wilson or FDR for selling war bonds and getting us involved in the unfunded wars of WWI and WWII, respectively? Or how about Democrats JFK and LBJ for getting us involved in the largely unfunded war of Vietnam? Just curious how you can now stand by the Democratic brand after ripping on Bush as harshly as you do. BTW - Nice clip from TGMBC!
Samantha, the Affordable Care Act (what some rude people refer to as "Obamacare") is working very well for me and several relatives. I've received an overcharge refund from my healthcare provider, a relative who had to self-insure with a pre-existing condition rider (and additional cost) may now get insurance for their entire body at a more reasonable price, and a relative with a new college grad can keep the kid on their own insurance policy (at no cost to the government). What's not to like about that? I also like the fact that savings were found in Medicare which directs more funds toward services (and the government needs to be allowed to negotiate bulk rates with Big Pharma, etc.). Another plus is for women in the states where insurance companies discriminated against them with higher (and sometimes double) rates than men of the same age. I also like the idea of consortium-type insurance plans for smaller businesses--that should help keep rates down. As we know, rates become more competitive when there are more people on the policy. From where I'm standing, ACA is pretty good, but more work is needed. Ideally we need a national health care plan, which gets rid of the middleman insurance companies.
TGMBC is an amazing film!
Clinton Iraq has abused its last chance BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS December 16, 1998 WASHINGTON CNN From the Oval Office, President Clinton told the nation Wednesday evening why he ordered new military strikes against Iraq. The president said Iraqs refusal to cooperate with U.N. weapons inspectors presented a threat to the entire world. Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons, Clinton said. http://articles.cnn.com/1998-12-16/us/9812_16_clinton.iraq.speech_1_weapons-inspectors-united-nations-special-commission-biological-weapons?_s=PM:US
Even if you believe that Iraq was all about oil, does the US not have a vested interest in assuring the free flow of oil from the Middle East? Remember how disruptive the OPEC embargo of the '70's was on our economy? So isn't the interest in oil alone more than enough to justify our involvement in Iraq? Or does your non-union built Toyota Camry run on rainbows and sunshine?
Fresh green beans are butt nasty.... Except when served with asparagus! ;-)